File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Critiques of Kantianism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2026-02-24
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/90578
Fulltext
http://analyticphilosophy.kr/149
Citation
한국분석철학회 2026 겨울 학술발표회
Abstract
The Kantian notions of the noumenal, unconceptualized, and unframed worlds are all incoherent. Kantians commit the fallacy of pre-figuration themselves when they attribute the fallacy of pre-figuration to metaphysical realists. Kantians and some monotheists are similar in that they tell others that no claim can be made about the noumenal world and God, respectively, while they themselves make some claims about them. Kantianism persists not because it is a profound truth but because it is an ego-expander
Publisher
한국분석철학회

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.