File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.conferencePlace KO -
dc.citation.conferencePlace 연세대학교 -
dc.citation.title 한국분석철학회 2026 겨울 학술발표회 -
dc.contributor.author Park, Seungbae -
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-05T14:33:18Z -
dc.date.available 2026-03-05T14:33:18Z -
dc.date.created 2026-02-25 -
dc.date.issued 2026-02-24 -
dc.description.abstract The Kantian notions of the noumenal, unconceptualized, and unframed worlds are all incoherent. Kantians commit the fallacy of pre-figuration themselves when they attribute the fallacy of pre-figuration to metaphysical realists. Kantians and some monotheists are similar in that they tell others that no claim can be made about the noumenal world and God, respectively, while they themselves make some claims about them. Kantianism persists not because it is a profound truth but because it is an ego-expander -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation 한국분석철학회 2026 겨울 학술발표회 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/90578 -
dc.identifier.url http://analyticphilosophy.kr/149 -
dc.language 한국어 -
dc.publisher 한국분석철학회 -
dc.title Critiques of Kantianism -
dc.type Conference Paper -
dc.date.conferenceDate 2026-02-24 -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.