| dc.citation.conferencePlace |
KO |
- |
| dc.citation.conferencePlace |
연세대학교 |
- |
| dc.citation.title |
한국분석철학회 2026 겨울 학술발표회 |
- |
| dc.contributor.author |
Park, Seungbae |
- |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2026-03-05T14:33:18Z |
- |
| dc.date.available |
2026-03-05T14:33:18Z |
- |
| dc.date.created |
2026-02-25 |
- |
| dc.date.issued |
2026-02-24 |
- |
| dc.description.abstract |
The Kantian notions of the noumenal, unconceptualized, and unframed worlds are all incoherent. Kantians commit the fallacy of pre-figuration themselves when they attribute the fallacy of pre-figuration to metaphysical realists. Kantians and some monotheists are similar in that they tell others that no claim can be made about the noumenal world and God, respectively, while they themselves make some claims about them. Kantianism persists not because it is a profound truth but because it is an ego-expander |
- |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation |
한국분석철학회 2026 겨울 학술발표회 |
- |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/90578 |
- |
| dc.identifier.url |
http://analyticphilosophy.kr/149 |
- |
| dc.language |
한국어 |
- |
| dc.publisher |
한국분석철학회 |
- |
| dc.title |
Critiques of Kantianism |
- |
| dc.type |
Conference Paper |
- |
| dc.date.conferenceDate |
2026-02-24 |
- |