File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

오재은

Oh, Jae Eun
Nano-AIMS Structural Materials Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Detecting embedded rebar in cement mortar by frequency-difference electrical resistance tomography

Author(s)
Jeon, DonghoKim, Min KyoungWoo, HayoungJeong, YeounungOh, Jae EunKim, Dong JooYoon, Seyoon
Issued Date
2021-12
DOI
10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103974
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/54866
Fulltext
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580521004258?via%3Dihub
Citation
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, v.132, pp.103974
Abstract
This study investigated frequency-difference electrical resistance tomography (ERT) using a 16-channel ERT system to detect rebar embedded in cement mortar. Two different data collecting methods (i.e., referencedifference and frequency-difference) were used for ERT image reconstruction, and the reconstructed ERT images were validated with binarized micro-CT images. As a result, the reference-difference ERT was not suitable for detecting rebar in cement mortar. This method generated incorrect ERT reconstruction images since the target specimen and reference specimen is different, and thus an inconsistent contact impedance, electrode position error, and different pore distributions between the samples could generate measurement errors affecting internal conductivity distribution. However, use of the frequency-difference method provided more accurate and reliable results for detecting rebar. The ERT images were well-matched with the binarized micro-CT images. In frequency-difference ERT, an identical specimen is used to obtain measurement data, and thus the experimental errors can be largely reduced. In particular, the reconstruction result was influenced by the range of the two used frequencies. In wide-ranging frequency-difference ERT, the rebar was better tracked regardless of distance from the electrodes than when using a narrow range of frequencies.
Publisher
ELSEVIER
ISSN
0926-5805
Keyword (Author)
Electric resistance tomography (ERT)X-ray micro-CTNon-destructive testingRebar detectionFrequency-difference ERT
Keyword
UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOWIMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHYCONCRETERECONSTRUCTIONEIDORSDAMAGE

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.