BROWSE

Related Researcher

Author's Photo

Lim, Hankwon
Sustainable Process Analysis, Design, and Engineering (SPADE)
Research Interests
  • Process analysis, Process design, Techno-economic analysis, Separation process, Reaction engineering, Computational fluid dynamics, Membrane reactor, H2 energy, Water electrolysis, Vanadium redox flow battery, Greenhouse gas reduction

ITEM VIEW & DOWNLOAD

Comparative techno-economic analysis for steam methane reforming in a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor: Simultaneous H-2 production and CO2 capture

Cited 0 times inthomson ciCited 0 times inthomson ci
Title
Comparative techno-economic analysis for steam methane reforming in a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor: Simultaneous H-2 production and CO2 capture
Author
Lee, HyunjunLee, BoreumByun, ManheeLim, Hankwon
Issue Date
2021-07
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Citation
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, v.171, pp.383 - 394
Abstract
Hydrogen (H-2) is currently receiving significant attention as a sustainable energy carrier. Steam methane reforming (SMR) accounts for approximately 50% of H-2 production methods worldwide. However, SMR is concern because of the prodigious carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that have resulted in a global climate emergency. CO2 emissions remain, although some efforts have been made in a membrane reactor (MR) coupled with membranes to improve the H-2 yield. A sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR) has been proposed as a next-generation process for simultaneous H-2 production and CO2 capture. In this study, the thermodynamic and economic evaluation of SEMR were implemented using a process simulation, an itemized cost estimation, a sensitivity analysis (SA), and an uncertainty analysis (UA). The thermodynamic analysis results revealed that unit H-2 production costs of 4.53,1.98, and 3.04 $ kgH(2)(- 1) were obtained at 773 K for a conventional packed-bed reactor (PBR), a MR, and a SEMR, respectively. The SA results identified PSA as the most critical economic parameter for a unit H-2 production cost for a PBR, whereas natural gas is determined to be the most influential parameter for a MR and a SEMR. The UA results from a Monte-Carlo simulation provided a broad range of unit H-2 production costs, with 4.26-5.44 $ kgH(2)(-1) for a PBR, 1.61-2.94 $ kgH(2)(- 1) for a MR, and 2.83-4.19 $ kgH(2)(-1)for an SEMR. This indicates that using a SEMR for next-generation H-2 production and CO2 capture is beneficial. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/53972
URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876221002069?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.05.013
ISSN
0263-8762
Appears in Collections:
ECHE_Journal Papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

find_unist can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Show full item record

qrcode

  • mendeley

    citeulike

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

MENU