File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 394 -
dc.citation.startPage 383 -
dc.citation.title CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN -
dc.citation.volume 171 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyunjun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Boreum -
dc.contributor.author Byun, Manhee -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T15:38:44Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T15:38:44Z -
dc.date.created 2021-08-09 -
dc.date.issued 2021-07 -
dc.description.abstract Hydrogen (H-2) is currently receiving significant attention as a sustainable energy carrier. Steam methane reforming (SMR) accounts for approximately 50% of H-2 production methods worldwide. However, SMR is concern because of the prodigious carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that have resulted in a global climate emergency. CO2 emissions remain, although some efforts have been made in a membrane reactor (MR) coupled with membranes to improve the H-2 yield. A sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR) has been proposed as a next-generation process for simultaneous H-2 production and CO2 capture. In this study, the thermodynamic and economic evaluation of SEMR were implemented using a process simulation, an itemized cost estimation, a sensitivity analysis (SA), and an uncertainty analysis (UA). The thermodynamic analysis results revealed that unit H-2 production costs of 4.53,1.98, and 3.04 $ kgH(2)(- 1) were obtained at 773 K for a conventional packed-bed reactor (PBR), a MR, and a SEMR, respectively. The SA results identified PSA as the most critical economic parameter for a unit H-2 production cost for a PBR, whereas natural gas is determined to be the most influential parameter for a MR and a SEMR. The UA results from a Monte-Carlo simulation provided a broad range of unit H-2 production costs, with 4.26-5.44 $ kgH(2)(-1) for a PBR, 1.61-2.94 $ kgH(2)(- 1) for a MR, and 2.83-4.19 $ kgH(2)(-1)for an SEMR. This indicates that using a SEMR for next-generation H-2 production and CO2 capture is beneficial. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, v.171, pp.383 - 394 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.05.013 -
dc.identifier.issn 0263-8762 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85107292671 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/53972 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876221002069?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000669012500014 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER -
dc.title Comparative techno-economic analysis for steam methane reforming in a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor: Simultaneous H-2 production and CO2 capture -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Chemical -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Process simulation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Thermodynamic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Techno-economic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor H-2 production -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor CO2 capture -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Sorption-enhanced membrane reactor -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HIGH-PURITY HYDROGEN -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SORBENT-CATALYST MATERIAL -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FIXED-BED -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BIFUNCTIONAL CATALYST -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CARBONATION REACTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ECONOMIC-EVALUATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WATER ELECTROLYSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LOW-TEMPERATURE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus OPTIMIZATION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.