File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이세민

Lee, Semin
Computational Biology Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Polygenic risk score validation using Korean genomes of 265 early-onset acute myocardial infarction patients and 636 healthy controls

Author(s)
Bhak, YoungjuneJeon, YeonsuJeon, SungwonYoon, ChanghanKim, MinBlazyte, AstaKim, YeonkyungKang, YounghuiKim, ChangjaeLee, Sang YeubBae, Jang-WhanKim, WeonKim, Yeo JinShim, JungaeKim, NayeongChun, SungKim, Byoung-ChulKim, Byung ChulLee, SeminBhak, JongShin, Eun-Seok
Issued Date
2021-02
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0246538
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/52549
Fulltext
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246538
Citation
PLOS ONE, v.16, no.2, pp.e0246538
Abstract
Background The polygenic risk score (PRS) developed for coronary artery disease (CAD) is known to be effective for classifying patients with CAD and predicting subsequent events. However, the PRS was developed mainly based on the analysis of Caucasian genomes and has not been validated for East Asians. We aimed to evaluate the PRS in the genomes of Korean early-onset AMI patients (n = 265, age <= 50 years) following PCI and controls (n = 636) to examine whether the PRS improves risk prediction beyond conventional risk factors. Results The odds ratio of the PRS was 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-1.99) for early-onset AMI patients compared with the controls. For the classification of patients, the area under the curve (AUC) for the combined model with the six conventional risk factors (diabetes mellitus, family history of CAD, hypertension, body mass index, hypercholesterolemia, and current smoking) and PRS was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94) while that for the six conventional risk factors was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93). Although the AUC for PRS alone was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61-0.69), adding the PRS to the six conventional risk factors significantly improved the accuracy of the prediction model (P = 0.015). Patients with the upper 50% of PRS showed a higher frequency of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.47-3.26) than the others. Conclusions The PRS using 265 early-onset AMI genomes showed improvement in the identification of patients in the Korean population and showed potential for genomic screening in early life to complement conventional risk prediction.
Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
ISSN
1932-6203
Keyword
ASSOCIATIONPREDICTIONACCURACYTOOL

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.