File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

문회리

Moon, Hoi Ri
Functional Inorganic Nanomaterials Lab for Energy
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Guest-driven structural flexibility of 2D coordination polymers: Synthesis, structural characterizations, and gas sorption properties

Author(s)
Hyun, Sung-minKim, Tae KyungKim, Yun KyeongMoon, DohyunMoon, Hoi Ri
Issued Date
2013-07
DOI
10.1016/j.inoche.2013.04.020
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/3463
Fulltext
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877047336
Citation
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS, v.33, pp.52 - 56
Abstract
Two coordination polymers, {[(NiLallyl)2(BuTC)] â™2DEFâ™2H2O} (1) and {[(NiL allyl)2(BuTC)]â™3H2O} (2), ([NiLallyl](ClO4)2 = [Ni(C14H 30N6)](ClO4)2, H4BuTC = 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid, DEF = N,N′-diethylformamide), were prepared by the self-assembly of [NiLallyl](ClO4) 2 and H4BuTC in DEF/H2O and acetonitrile/H 2O, respectively. Single crystal X-ray diffraction and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) results revealed that 1 and 2 have two-dimensional layered structures, and the layers were stacked infinitely. Further, guest molecules were intercalated between the layers. Since both of coordination polymers 1 and 2 were constructed from the same building blocks, the structure of each layer was identical. However, depending on the size and the nature of guest molecules, layer packing and the interlayer distances were different for each coordination polymer. Interestingly, due to the instability of DEF guest molecules intercalated in the coordination polymer 1, these guest molecules could be easily liberated from the host, consequently resulting in the same XRPD pattern as that of 2 with slightly different relative intensities. Dried compounds of 1 and 2 (1′ and 2′, respectively) also showed the same result as evidenced by the XRPD patterns. The similar but non-identical XRPD patterns were revealed that the dried structure 1′ had the same interlayer distance and the same intralayer structure as 2 and 2′ did, whereas its layer packing remained the same as that of 1. This subtle structural difference of 1′ and 2′ resulted in their different CO2 uptake behaviors at 195 K.
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
ISSN
1387-7003
Keyword (Author)
Coordination polymerStructural flexibilityGuest dependencyGas sorptionSelf-assembly
Keyword
METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKADSORPTIONSITES

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.