File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

문회리

Moon, Hoi Ri
Functional Inorganic Nanomaterials Lab for Energy
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 56 -
dc.citation.startPage 52 -
dc.citation.title INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS -
dc.citation.volume 33 -
dc.contributor.author Hyun, Sung-min -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Tae Kyung -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Yun Kyeong -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Dohyun -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Hoi Ri -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T03:43:28Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T03:43:28Z -
dc.date.created 2013-07-04 -
dc.date.issued 2013-07 -
dc.description.abstract Two coordination polymers, {[(NiLallyl)2(BuTC)] â™2DEFâ™2H2O} (1) and {[(NiL allyl)2(BuTC)]â™3H2O} (2), ([NiLallyl](ClO4)2 = [Ni(C14H 30N6)](ClO4)2, H4BuTC = 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid, DEF = N,N′-diethylformamide), were prepared by the self-assembly of [NiLallyl](ClO4) 2 and H4BuTC in DEF/H2O and acetonitrile/H 2O, respectively. Single crystal X-ray diffraction and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) results revealed that 1 and 2 have two-dimensional layered structures, and the layers were stacked infinitely. Further, guest molecules were intercalated between the layers. Since both of coordination polymers 1 and 2 were constructed from the same building blocks, the structure of each layer was identical. However, depending on the size and the nature of guest molecules, layer packing and the interlayer distances were different for each coordination polymer. Interestingly, due to the instability of DEF guest molecules intercalated in the coordination polymer 1, these guest molecules could be easily liberated from the host, consequently resulting in the same XRPD pattern as that of 2 with slightly different relative intensities. Dried compounds of 1 and 2 (1′ and 2′, respectively) also showed the same result as evidenced by the XRPD patterns. The similar but non-identical XRPD patterns were revealed that the dried structure 1′ had the same interlayer distance and the same intralayer structure as 2 and 2′ did, whereas its layer packing remained the same as that of 1. This subtle structural difference of 1′ and 2′ resulted in their different CO2 uptake behaviors at 195 K. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS, v.33, pp.52 - 56 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.inoche.2013.04.020 -
dc.identifier.issn 1387-7003 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84877047336 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/3463 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877047336 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000320749400012 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV -
dc.title Guest-driven structural flexibility of 2D coordination polymers: Synthesis, structural characterizations, and gas sorption properties -
dc.type Article -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Chemistry, Inorganic & Nuclear -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Chemistry -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Coordination polymer -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Structural flexibility -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Guest dependency -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Gas sorption -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Self-assembly -
dc.subject.keywordPlus METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORK -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ADSORPTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SITES -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.