File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조형준

Cho, Hyungjoon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Influence of B1 Inhomogeneity on Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Simulation Study

Author(s)
Park, Bum WooChoi, Byung SeSung, Yu SubWoo, Dong-CheolShim, Woo HyunKim, Kyung WonChoi, Soon SeokPae, Sang JoonSuh, Ji-YeonCho, HyungjoonKim, Jeong Kon
Issued Date
2017-07
DOI
10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.585
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/21678
Fulltext
https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.585
Citation
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.18, no.4, pp.585 - 596
Abstract
Objective: To simulate the B1-inhomogeneity-induced variation of pharmacokinetic parameters on DCE-MRI.
Materials and Methods: B1-inhomogeneity-induced flip angle (FA) variation was estimated in a phantom study. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the FA-deviation-induced measurement error of the pre-contrast R1, contrast-enhancement ratio, Gd concentration, and two-compartment pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, ve and vp).
Results: B1-inhomogeneity resulted in -23% ~ 5% fluctuations (95% confidence interval (CI) of % error) of FA. The 95% CIs of FA-dependent % errors in the gray matter and blood were as follows: -16.7% - 61.8% and -16.7% - 61.8% for the pre-contrast R1, -1.0% - 0.3% and -5.2% - 1.3% for the contrast-enhancement ratio, and -14.2% - 58.1% and -14.1% - 57.8% for the Gd concentration, respectively. These resulted in -43.1% - 48.4% error for Ktrans, -32.3% - 48.6% error for the ve, and -43.2% - 48.6% error for vp. The pre-contrast R1 was more vulnerable to FA error than the contrast-enhancement ratio, and was therefore a significant cause of the Gd-concentration error. For example, a -10% FA error led to a 23.6% deviation in the pre-contrast R1, -0.4% in the contrast-enhancement ratio, and 23.6% in the Gd concentration. In a simulated condition with a 3% FA error in a target lesion and a -10% FA error in a feeding vessel, the % errors of the pharmacokinetic parameters were -23.7% for Ktrans, -23.7% for ve, and -23.7% for vp.
Conclusion: Even a small degree of B1-inhomogeneity can cause a significant error in the measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters on DCE-MRI, while the vulnerability of the pre-contrast R1 calculations to FA deviations is a significant cause of the miscalculation.
Publisher
KOREAN RADIOLOGICAL SOC
ISSN
1229-6929
Keyword (Author)
BrainMagnetic resonance imagingDynamic contrast enhancementMonte Carlo methodPhantoms, imaging
Keyword
DCE-MRIFIELD INHOMOGENEITY3.0 TBREASTPERFUSIONB-1PARAMETERSTRACERERRORS3T

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.