File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

신승재

Shin, Seung-Jae
THeoretical Energy Materials Modelling for Engineering & Science
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry

Author(s)
Govindarajan, NitishKastlunger, GeorgGauthier, Joseph A.Cheng, JunFilot, IvoHagopian, ArthurHansen, Heine AntonHuang, JunKowalski, Piotr M.Liu, JinwenLombardi, Juan M.Maraschin, MikaelPeterson, AndrewPillai, Hemanth S.Prats, HectorPrice, Conor J.van Roij, ReneRossmeisl, JanSeemakurthi, Ranga RohitShin, Seung-JaeSmith, AudreyZhu, Jia-XinDoblhoff-Dier, Katharina
Issued Date
2025-09
DOI
10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00748
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/88641
Citation
ACS ENERGY LETTERS, v.10, no.9, pp.4277 - 4288
Abstract
Computational electrochemistry is hard-anybody who has ever tried will know. We argue that the reasons for its complexity lie not only in the multiscale nature of electrochemical processes but also in the rapid, ongoing method development in the field. This has resulted in a lack of clear guidelines and many open discussions in the community. These issues were also the topic of a recent Lorentz Center workshop, the key take-away messages of which are highlighted in this Perspective. In particular, we discuss why the choice between constant potential and constant charge simulations is less trivial than it may seem, why interpreting electrochemical reaction free energy diagrams can be challenging, why the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equation is not all there is, and why we desperately need more benchmarking in the field.
Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
ISSN
2380-8195
Keyword
OXYGEN REDUCTIONPROTON DISCHARGEEVOLUTIONCO2ACTIVATIONINSIGHTSDISSOLUTIONUNDERSTANDSIMULATIONDEPENDENCE

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.