File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김병민

Kim, Byungmin
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Research Group
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Seismic response of operational tunnels to earthquakes with foreshocks or aftershocks

Author(s)
Lee, JunyoungAhn, Jae-KwangKim, Byungmin
Issued Date
2024-09
DOI
10.12989/gae.2024.38.6.621
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/84039
Citation
GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, v.38, no.6, pp.621 - 631
Abstract
In designing earthquake-resistant structures, we traditionally select dynamic loads based on the recurrence period of earthquakes, using individual seismic records or aligning them with the design spectrum. However, these records often represent isolated waveforms lacking continuity, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of natural seismic phenomena. The Earth's crustal movement, both before and after a significant earthquake, can trigger a series of both minor and major seismic events. These minor earthquakes, which often occur in short time before or after the major seismic events, prompt a critical reassessment of their potential impact on structural design. In this study, we conducted a detailed tunnel response analysis to assess the impact of both single mainshock and multiple earthquake scenarios (including foreshock-mainshock and mainshock- aftershock sequences). Utilizing numerical analysis, we explored how multiple earthquakes affect tunnel deformation. Our findings reveal that sequential seismic events, even those of moderate magnitude, can exert considerable stress on tunnel lining, resulting in heightened bending stress and permanent displacement. This research highlights a significant insight: current seismic design methodologies, which predominantly focus on the largest seismic intensity, may fail to account for the cumulative impact of smaller, yet frequent, seismic events like foreshocks and aftershocks. Our results demonstrate that dynamic analyses considering only a single mainshock are likely to underestimate the potential damage (ie., ovaling deformation, failure lining, permanent displacement etc.) when compared to analyses that incorporate multiple earthquake scenarios.
Publisher
TECHNO-PRESS
ISSN
2005-307X
Keyword (Author)
permanent displacementseismic designtunnel liningearthquake sequencesnumerical simulation
Keyword
CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMESMOUNTAIN TUNNELSCHI-CHIDESIGNBEHAVIORDAMAGETAIWANSOIL

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.