File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative study of biofuel production based on spent coffee grounds transesterification and pyrolysis: Process simulation, techno-economic, and life cycle assessment

Author(s)
Gu, JiwonLee, AejinChoe, ChanggwonLim, Hankwon
Issued Date
2023-11
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139308
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/67383
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, v.428, pp.139308
Abstract
Biomass is an interesting energy source to replace fossil fuels for carbon neutrality, which is called biofuel. Spent coffee grounds (SCG) have the potential for the biofuel production since it is generated a lot due to the increased coffee consumption, and it has a high heating value. In this study, to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibilities of biofuel from SCG, the feasibilities of biofuel production by transesterification and pyrolysis of SCG were estimated and compared via process simulation, techno-economic analysis, and life cycle assessment. Consequently, the production cost and CO2 emissions of transesterification were 3.08 times and 6.92 times larger than pyrolysis because feedstock pretreatment was necessary before the transesterification and pretreatment efficiency were low. Pyrolysis biofuel had a low 32.18 MJ kg-1 higher heating value compared to the 40.10 MJ kg -1 of transesterification biofuel due to the water contents depending on the cooling temperature of products. By varying efficiency and cooling temperature through the sensitivity analysis, costs became 30.76-43.71 $ GJ-1 and 8.82-12.35 $ GJ-1 for transesterification and pyrolysis, respectively. Although efficiency improved, trans-esterification cost could not overcome pyrolysis because of the additional pretreatment and separation. The CO2 emissions were reduced greatly in the transesterification system while the pyrolysis system gradually increased. Even though the pyrolysis system could emit more CO2 when transesterification efficiency improved, pyrolysis recycling would be proper for the SCG feedstock because of the economic feasibility.
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
ISSN
0959-6526
Keyword (Author)
Spent coffee groundsBiofuelProcess simulationTechno-economic analysisLife cycle assessment
Keyword
BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSISWASTE COOKING OILBIODIESEL PRODUCTIONBIO-OILEXTRACTION

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.