File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Is God an Abstract Entity?

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2023-06
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/64707
Fulltext
http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/issue19.html
Citation
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY, v.19, no.4, pp.71 - 81
Abstract
According to the abstract notion of God, God is an abstract object, and we use theological intuition to know about God. According to the concrete notion of God, by contrast, God is a concrete object, and we use the same cognitive faculties to know about God and other concrete objects. I raise the following objections to the abstract notion. It multiplies cognitive faculties beyond necessity. It conflicts with the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument, with the theological view that God created the world, with the traditional arguments for the existence of God, and with the notion of God in the Bible. The concrete notion works better than the abstract notion for religious practitioners.
Publisher
Acad Organisation Environmental Engineering & Sustainable Development
ISSN
1841-0464
Keyword (Author)
concretemathematicalrealismtheologicalintuition

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.