File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Supremacy of IBE over Bayesian Conditionalization

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2023-04
DOI
10.15388/Problemos.2023.103.5
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/64229
Fulltext
https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/32073
Citation
PROBLEMOS, v.103, pp.66 - 76
Abstract
Van Fraassen does not merely perform Bayesian conditionalization on his pragmatic theory of scientific explanation; he uses inference to the best explanation (IBE) to justify it, contrary to what Prasetya thinks. Without first using IBE, we cannot carry out Bayesian conditionalization, contrary to what van Fraassen thinks. The argument from a bad lot, which van Fraassen constructs to criticize IBE, backfires on both the pragmatic theory and Bayesian conditionalization, pace van Fraassen and Prasetya.
Publisher
Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
ISSN
1392-1126

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.