File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임성훈

Lim, Sunghoon
Industrial Intelligence Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

중소 제조기업의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 제조AI 핵심 정책과제 도출에 관한 연구

Alternative Title
Discovering Essential AI-based Manufacturing Policy Issues for Competitive Reinforcement of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises†
Author(s)
김일중김우순김준영채희수우지영도경민임성훈신민수이지은김흥남
Issued Date
2022-12
DOI
10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.647
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/60885
Fulltext
https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.647
Citation
품질경영학회지, v.50, no.4, pp.647 - 664
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to derive major policies that domestic small and medium-sized manufacturing
companies should consider to maximize productivity and quality improvement by utilizing manufacturing
data and AI, and to find priorities and implications.
Methods: In this study, domestic and international issues and literature review by country were conducted
to derive major considerations such as manufacturing AI technology, manufacturing AI talent, manufacturing
AI data and manufacturing AI ecosystem. Additionally, the questionnaire survey targeting 46 experts of manufacturing
data and AI industry were conducted. Finally, the major considerations and detailed factors importance
were derived by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Results: As a result of the study, it was found that 'manufacturing AI technology', 'manufacturing AI talent',
'manufacturing AI data', and 'manufacturing AI ecosystem' exist as key considerations for domestic manufacturing
AI. After empirical analysis, the importance of the four key considerations was found to be 'manufacturing
AI ecosystem (0.272)', 'manufacturing AI data (0.265)', 'manufacturing AI technology (0.233)', and
'manufacturing AI talent (0.230)'. The importance of the derived four viewpoints is maintained at a similar
level. In addition, looking at the detailed variables with the highest importance for each of the four perspectives,
‘Best Practice’, ‘manufacturing data quality management regime, ‘manufacturing data collection infrastructure’,
and ‘manufacturing AI manpower level of solution providers’ were found.
Conclusion: For the sustainable growth of the domestic manufacturing AI ecosystem, it should be possible
to develop and promote manufacturing AI policies in a balanced way by considering all four derived viewpoints.
This paper is expected to be used as an effective guideline when developing policies for upgrading manufacturing
through domestic manufacturing data and AI in the future.
Publisher
한국품질경영학회
ISSN
1229-1889
Keyword (Author)
Manufacturing AI PolicyManufacturing CompetitivenessManufacturing SMEsManufacturing DataDigital Transformation

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.