File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

송창근

Song, Chang-Keun
Air Quality Impact Assessment Research Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Determination of mixing layer height from co-located lidar, ceilometer and wind Doppler lidar measurements: Intercomparison and implications for PM2.5 simulations

Author(s)
Park, SoojinKim, Man-HaeYeo, HuidongShim, KyuseokLee, Hyo-JungKim, Cheol-HeeSong, Chang-KeunPark, Moon-SooShimizu, AtsushiNishizawa, TomoakiKim, Sang-Woo
Issued Date
2022-02
DOI
10.1016/j.apr.2021.101310
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/58500
Fulltext
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S130910422100372X
Citation
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, v.13, no.2
Abstract
Mixing layer height (MLH) is retrieved at an urban site in Seoul, Korea, from 2-year collocated remote sensing instrument measurements: elastic aerosol lidar, ceilometer, and wind Doppler lidar (WDL). All three measurements captured clear diurnal patterns of MLH development and break down, but large discrepancies were noted in the nocturnal MLH and the onset time of MLH development. Vertical wind speed standard deviation (sigma(w)) from WDL measurements displayed low MLHs during nighttime, compared to MLH retrieved from aerosol backscattering intensity profiles (mean bias = -0.21 km). To this extent, mixing represented by sigma(w) showed close correlation with surface heating but significant discrepancies with the vertical distribution of atmospheric constituents, especially at night. Comparison of MLH from elastic aerosol lidar and WDL with WRF-Chem simulation results showed that WRF-Chem MLH closely resembled MLH retrieved from WDL, indicating that WRF-Chem sufficiently simulated turbulence, but displayed lower nocturnal MLH compared to lidar-derived MLH. Furthermore, investigation of the vertical profiles of PM(2.5 )in the model displayed confined distribution of aerosols within the nocturnal MLH, leading to overestimation of surface PM2.5 concentration. For the case studies of May 12 and 18, 2016, implicating full mixing within the MLH defined by aerosol lidar measurements on WRF-Chem PM2.5 vertical distribution simulations was shown to significantly reduce WRF-Chem PM2.5 simulation errors from mean normalized bias of 52% to 19%.
Publisher
TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
ISSN
1309-1042
Keyword (Author)
Mixing layer height (MLH)Elastic aerosol lidarCeilometerWind Doppler lidarWRF-ChemPM2.5
Keyword
PLANETARY BOUNDARY-LAYERAEROSOLEVOLUTIONSEOULCLIMATOLOGYRETRIEVALWRF/CHEMOZONEMODELAREA

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.