File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

류동수

Ryu, Dongsu
Astrophysics Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effects of Forcing on Shocks and Energy Dissipation in Interstellar and Intracluster Turbulences

Author(s)
Cho, HyunjinRyu, DongsuKang, Heysung
Issued Date
2022-02
DOI
10.3847/1538-4357/ac41cc
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/57676
Fulltext
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac41cc
Citation
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, v.926, no.2, pp.183
Abstract
Observations indicate that turbulence in the interstellar medium (ISM) is supersonic (M (turb) >> 1) and strongly magnetized (beta similar to 0.01-1), while in the intracluster medium (ICM) it is subsonic (M (turb) less than or similar to 1) and weakly magnetized (beta similar to 100). Here, M (turb) is the turbulent Mach number and beta is the plasma beta. We study the properties of shocks induced in these disparate environments, including the distribution of the shock Mach number, M (s) , and the dissipation of the turbulent energy at shocks, through numerical simulations using a high-order, accurate code based on the weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme. In particular, we investigate the effects of different modes of the forcing that drives turbulence: solenoidal, compressive, and a mixture of the two. In ISM turbulence, while the density distribution looks different with different forcings, the velocity power spectrum, P (v) , on small scales exhibits only weak dependence. Hence, the statistics of shocks depend weakly on forcing either. In the ISM models with M (turb) approximate to 10 and beta similar to 0.1, the fraction of the turbulent energy dissipated at shocks is estimated to be similar to 15%, not sensitive to the forcing mode. In contrast, in ICM turbulence, P (v) as well as the density distribution show strong dependence on forcing. The frequency and average Mach number of shocks are greater for compressive forcing than for solenoidal forcing; so is the energy dissipation. The fraction of the ensuing shock dissipation is in the range of similar to 10%-35% in the ICM models with M (turb) approximate to 0.5 and beta similar to 10(6). The rest of the turbulent energy should be dissipated through turbulent cascade.
Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
ISSN
0004-637X
Keyword
EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATIONDENSITY PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONLARGE-SCALE STRUCTUREMAGNETIC-FIELDSGALAXY CLUSTERSSTAR-FORMATIONUNIVERSALITYWAVESGASFLUCTUATIONS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.