File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김영식

Kim, Youngsik
YK Research
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Investigation on the Structure and Properties of Na3.1Zr1.55Si2.3P0.7O11 as a Solid Electrolyte and Its Application in a Seawater Battery

Author(s)
Go, WooseokKim, JongwooPyo, JinhoWolfenstine, Jeffrey B.Kim, Youngsik
Issued Date
2021-11
DOI
10.1021/acsami.1c17338
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/55167
Fulltext
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c17338
Citation
ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, v.13, no.44, pp.52727 - 52735
Abstract
The ionic conductivity, bend strength, and electro-chemical performance in a seawater battery (SWB) of an Na3.1Zr1.55Si2.3P0.7O11 (vA-NASICON) solid electrolyte were compared to those of Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (H-NASICON). vA-NASICON exhibited three times higher total ionic conductivity (8.6 x 10(-4) S/cm) than HNASICON (2.9 x 10(-4) S/cm). This is due to the higher bulk ionic conductivity and lower grain boundary resistance of vA-NASICON. The higher bulk conductivity of vA-NASICON is a result of its higher Na content, leading to a larger concentration of charge carriers and/or the formation of a higher conductive rhombohedral phase. The lower grain boundary resistance of vA-NASICON is a result of its larger grain size and reduced ZrO2 content. The bend strength of vA-NASICON (95 MPa) was 30% higher than that of the H-NASICON ceramic. The higher bend strength of vA-NASICON was attributed to its reduced ZrO2 secondary phase (1.1 vol %) compared to that of H-NASICON (2.6 vol %). When the vA-NASICON ceramic was tested in the SWB as a solid electrolyte, an 8.27% improved voltage efficiency and 81% higher power output were demonstrated, compared to those of H-NASICON, as a result of its higher total ionic conductivity and mechanical strength. At the same time, the vA-NASICON membrane revealed comparable cycle life (1000 h) to that of H-NASICON. These results suggest that vA-NASICON can be a better alternative than H-NASICON for use in the SWB.
Publisher
American Chemical Society
ISSN
1944-8244
Keyword (Author)
solid electrolyteNASICONceramicionic conductivityseawater battery
Keyword
CHEMICAL-STABILITYIONIC-CONDUCTIVITYNASICONSTATEMECHANISMDEPENDENCETOUGHNESSIMPEDANCECERAMICS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.