File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Biogas upgrading through blends of deep eutectic solvents and monoethanol amine: 4 E analysis (energy, exergy, environmental, and economic)

Author(s)
Haider, JunaidKazmi, BilalNaquash, AhmadQyyum, Muhammad AbdulAli, ImranLee, MoonyongLim, Hankwon
Issued Date
2021-08
DOI
10.1039/d1gc00714a
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/53965
Fulltext
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/GC/D1GC00714A
Citation
GREEN CHEMISTRY, v.23, no.16, pp.6076 - 6089
Abstract
Blends of monoethanol amine (MEA) with an aqueous deep eutectic solvent (DES), with MEA present in various proportions of 5, 10, and 15 wt%, are used in process design for biogas upgrading. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that presents process analysis based on 4 major performance indicators, namely energy, exergy, environmental, and economic analysis, for biogas upgrading using a hybrid solvent. The process is modeled in Aspen Plus V10 commercial software. MEA and DES based configurations were considered as the base cases for the sake of performance comparison with the proposed configurations. Process evaluation determined that the addition of MEA to ChCl/urea not only reduces the amount of DES (>= 40%), but also improves the functionality of MEA itself together with overall solvent characteristics. As a result, the reduction in energy consumption in each proposed case is >= 72% compared to the MEA-based base case. While the process efficiency in terms of exergy destruction is the highest in the 15 wt% MEA case, the 5 wt% MEA case exhibits more potential in terms of environmental aspects. However, the economic factor is in favor of the 10 wt% MEA case with TAC savings of up to 27.8%. The overall process evaluation based on performance indicators revealed that the choice of hybrid solvent improves the efficiency of the process and the hybrid solvent has the potential to replace conventional solvents.
Publisher
ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
ISSN
1463-9262
Keyword
IONIC LIQUIDSCHOLINE CHLORIDECARBON-DIOXIDETECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENTBIOMETHANE PRODUCTIONAQUEOUS MIXTURESCO2 CAPTURESOLUBILITYIMIDAZOLIUMSIMULATION

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.