File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Drug-coated balloon treatment for nonsmall de-novo coronary artery disease: angiographic and clinical outcomes

Author(s)
Her, Ae-YoungYuan, Song LinJun, Eun JungBhak, YoungjuneKim, Moo HyunGarg, ScotKim, Yong HoonKun, LiuHui, LinZhi, WangHao, JiangZhentao, ShiQiang, TangShin, Eun-Seok
Issued Date
2021-09
DOI
10.1097/MCA.0000000000001006
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/53528
Fulltext
https://journals.lww.com/coronary-artery/Abstract/2021/09000/Drug_coated_balloon_treatment_for_nonsmall_de_novo.7.aspx
Citation
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, v.32, no.6, pp.534 - 540
Abstract
Objectives Although drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are established for de-novo lesions in small coronary arteries, the impact of DCB treatment according to the reference vessel diameter (RVD) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions according to RVD. Methods and results A total of 227 patients were retrospectively enrolled and stratified according to an RVD >2.5 mm [nonsmall vessel disease (NSVD) group, n = 100] and <= 2.5 mm [small vessel disease (SVD) group, n = 127]. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at a 6-month follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and target vessel thrombosis). The LLL among the 206 patients (90.8%) returning for scheduled angiography at 6 month was similar (NSVD, 0.03 +/- 0.22 mm vs. SVD, 0.06 +/- 0.25 mm; P = 0.384). TVF was also comparable in both groups at a median follow-up of 3.4 years (NSVD, 7.0 vs. SVD, 7.9 %; P = 0.596). At baseline, there were numerically more dissections in the SVD group compared to the NSVD group (47.2 vs. 35.0 %; P = 0.064); however, most of these had disappeared in both groups at a 6-month follow-up. In a multivariable analysis, the presence of dissection was not associated with LLL or TVF in either group. Conclusions The safety and efficacy of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions, in terms of LLL and TVF, was unrelated to RVD.
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
ISSN
0954-6928
Keyword (Author)
de-novo coronary artery diseasedrug-coated balloonlate lumen lossnonsmall vesselsmall vesseltarget vessel failure
Keyword
ELUTING STENT

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.