File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

SelfJames Andrew

Self, James Andrew
Design Practice Research Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 66 -
dc.citation.number 1 -
dc.citation.startPage 53 -
dc.citation.title Archives of Design Research -
dc.citation.volume 34 -
dc.contributor.author Han, Ga-eul -
dc.contributor.author Jeong, Yunwoo -
dc.contributor.author Self, James A. -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T16:13:38Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T16:13:38Z -
dc.date.created 2021-05-27 -
dc.date.issued 2021-02 -
dc.description.abstract Background Design is no longer owned only by skilled designers. Product hacking, which has to emerge as a major phenomenon in industrial and consumer products, is an everyday design activity aimed at remaking and remanufacturing existing products that provide new meanings. This paper aims to contribute to identifying design innovation within cases of product hacking as examples of everyday design. Methods Product hacking workshops were conducted to explore the potential of conceptual blending as means to identify innovation in everyday design activity. Results Through a trial and error morphological approach, participants appeared to arrive at Aha! moments that then acted as a catalyst for the identification of a feasible blend possibility. Rather than the explicit operation or application of meaning blends in product hacking, participants relied upon the juxtaposition of existing products as both opportunity and constraint on product combination and meaning change. Conclusions Conceptual meaning blending may have the potential as means to identify and assess innovation in everyday design activity, including product hacking. However, results indicate that meaning blending and their meanings were not an explicit approach to meaning innovation through the blending of existing products. © 2021. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted educational and non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Archives of Design Research, v.34, no.1, pp.53 - 66 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.15187/adr.2021.02.34.1.53 -
dc.identifier.issn 1226-8046 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85101821087 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/52971 -
dc.identifier.url http://aodr.org/_common/do.php?a=full&bidx=2468&aidx=27988 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Korean Society of Design Science -
dc.title Where does Everyday Design Innovation come from?: Case studies in IKEA Product Hacking -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass kci -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Conceptual Blending -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Design-driven Innovation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Everyday Design -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor IKEA Hacking -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.