File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

MarcoComuzzi

Comuzzi, Marco
Intelligent Enterprise Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 6 -
dc.citation.startPage 68 -
dc.citation.title ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 11 -
dc.contributor.author Tama, Bayu Adhi -
dc.contributor.author Comuzzi, Marco -
dc.contributor.author Ko, Jonghyeon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T16:45:43Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T16:45:43Z -
dc.date.created 2020-09-14 -
dc.date.issued 2020-11 -
dc.description.abstract There is a growing need for empirical benchmarks that support researchers and practitioners in selecting the best machine learning technique for given prediction tasks. In this article, we consider the next event prediction task in business process predictive monitoring, and we extend our previously published benchmark by studying the impact on the performance of different encoding windows and of using ensemble schemes. The choice of whether to use ensembles and which scheme to use often depends on the type of data and classification task. While there is a general understanding that ensembles perform well in predictive monitoring of business processes, next event prediction is a task for which no other benchmarks involving ensembles are available. The proposed benchmark helps researchers to select a high-performing individual classifier or ensemble scheme given the variability at the case level of the event log under consideration. Experimental results show that choosing an optimal number of events for feature encoding is challenging, resulting in the need to consider each event log individually when selecting an optimal value. Ensemble schemes improve the performance of low-performing classifiers in this task, such as SVM, whereas high-performing classifiers, such as tree-based classifiers, are not better off when ensemble schemes are considered. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, v.11, no.6, pp.68 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1145/3406541 -
dc.identifier.issn 2157-6904 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85095864630 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/48198 -
dc.identifier.url https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3406541 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000589194300005 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY -
dc.title An Empirical Investigation of Different Classifiers, Encoding, and Ensemble Schemes for Next Event Prediction Using Business Process Event Logs -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Information Systems -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Computer Science -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Classifier ensembles -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor individual classifier -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor business process -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor predictive monitoring -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor empirical benchmark -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor homogeneous ensembles -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor next event prediction -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INTRUSION DETECTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BEHAVIOR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus DRIVEN -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TIME -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.