File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임동준

Lim, Dong-Joon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Relative importance analysis of inter-IS audit evaluation standards (Korea)

Author(s)
Lee, B.H.Kocaoglu, D.F.Lim, Dong-Joon
Issued Date
2012-07-29
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/39836
Citation
2012 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET'12), pp.693 - 724
Abstract
As a scale of the IS (Information System) becomes larger and level of dependence in creases, it becomes more important to examine and prevent potential risk factors that would occur during the development or operation process. Korean government introduced IS audit system in 2006 for stable development and efficient management. According to this law, every company who develop program for any Korean government branch over $500,000 is required to be audited. This audit system consists of 7 audit fields, 16 processes, 32 sub-areas, and 167 audit items. However, several problems have been raised that these criteria are unnecessarily fragmented and some of them are being overlapped thereby becoming inefficient as well as inconsistent. Therefore, this audit system needs to be evaluated as user demand level improves and software development environment changes rapidly. In this research, Korean IS audit items are prioritized using constant-sum method in order to identify their relative importance.
Publisher
PICMET'12

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.