Surrealism Is Not an Alternative to Scientific Realism
Cited 0 times inCited 0 times in
- Surrealism Is Not an Alternative to Scientific Realism
- Park, Seungbae
- Issue Date
- Institute for Economic and Social Research of the Romanian Academy
- LOGOS & EPISTEME, v.10, no.4, pp.379 - 393
- Surrealism holds that observables behave as if T were true, whereas scientific realism holds that T is true. Surrealism and scientific realism give different explanations of why T is empirically adequate. According to surrealism, T is empirically adequate because observables behave as if it were true. According to scientific realism, T is empirically adequate because it is true. I argue that the surrealist explanation merely clarifies the concept of empirical adequacy, whereas the realist explanation makes an inductive inference about T. Therefore, the surrealist explanation is a conceptual one, whereas the realist explanation is an empirical one, and the former is not an alternative to the latter.
- Appears in Collections:
- DGS_Journal Papers
- Files in This Item:
can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.