File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

How to Overcome Antirealists’ Objections to Scientific Realism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2020-02
DOI
10.1007/s10516-019-09432-3
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/31117
Fulltext
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10516-019-09432-3
Citation
AXIOMATHES, v.30, no.1, pp.1 - 12
Abstract
Van Fraassen contends that there is no argument that rationally compels us to disbelieve a successful theory, T. I object that this contention places upon him the burden of showing that scientific antirealists’ favorite arguments, such as the pessimistic induction, do not rationally compel us to disbelieve T. Van Fraassen uses the English view of rationality to rationally disbelieve T. I argue that realists can use it to rationally believe T, despite scientific antirealists’ favorite arguments against T.
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
1122-1151
Keyword (Author)
English view of rationalityPessimistic inductionScientific realismvan Fraassen

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.