File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

명경재

Myung, Kyungjae
Center for Genomic Integrity
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 258 -
dc.citation.number 3 -
dc.citation.startPage 243 -
dc.citation.title DNA REPAIR -
dc.citation.volume 2 -
dc.contributor.author Myung, K -
dc.contributor.author Kolodner, RD -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T11:13:16Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T11:13:16Z -
dc.date.created 2020-01-31 -
dc.date.issued 2003-03 -
dc.description.abstract The accumulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) is a characteristic of many types of cancer cells, although it is unclear what defects cause these rearrangements and how the different types of GCRs observed are formed. In the present study, we have used a Saccharomyces cerevisiae system for measuring GCRs to analyze the ability of a variety of DNA damaging agents to induce GCRs. The two most potent inducers of GCRs observed were methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) and HO-endonuclease-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Bleomycin, camptothecan and gamma-irradiation induced intermediate levels of GCRs and cisplatin induced very low levels of GCRs whereas N-methyl-N' -nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) primarily induced base substitution mutations. MMS treatment primarily induced rearrangements in which the end of a chromosome was deleted and a new telomere was added (telomere additions) and also induced translocations. Consistent with this GCR spectrum, the formation of MMS-induced GCRs was primarily dependent on telomere maintenance functions and were completely eliminated in mutants that were defective for both telomere maintenance functions and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In contrast, HO-endonuclease DSBs induced mostly translocations and interstitial deletions whereas few telomere additions were observed. Genetic analysis indicated that HO DSB-induced GCRs were suppressed by a number of pathways including the DNA damage checkpoints, DSB repair pathways and N-HEJ. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation DNA REPAIR, v.2, no.3, pp.243 - 258 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00216-1 -
dc.identifier.issn 1568-7864 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-0037356692 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/31089 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786402002161?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000180861400001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV -
dc.title Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Genetics & Heredity; Toxicology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Genetics & Heredity; Toxicology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor cancer -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor gross chromosomal rearrangement -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor DNA damage -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor double strand breaks -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor MMS -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor HO-endonuclease -
dc.subject.keywordPlus DOUBLE-STRAND-BREAK -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ATM-DEPENDENT PHOSPHORYLATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus END-JOINING REPAIR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus S-PHASE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MISMATCH REPAIR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GENETIC REQUIREMENTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INDUCED REPLICATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MRE11 COMPLEX -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RECOMBINATION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.