File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Replies to Healey’s Comments Regarding van Fraassen’s Positions

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2020-01
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/30941
Fulltext
https://social-epistemology.com/2020/01/28/replies-to-healeys-comments-regarding-van-fraassens-positions-seungbae-park/
Citation
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, v.9, no.1, pp.38 - 47
Abstract
Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen’s positions. The four comments concern the issues of whether ‘disbelief’ is appropriate or inappropriate to characterize van Fraassen’s position, what the relationship between a theory and models is for van Fraassen, whether he believes or not that a theory is empirically adequate, and whether destructive empiricism is tenable or not. I reply to those comments in this paper.
Publisher
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
ISSN
2471-9560
Keyword (Author)
Destructive EmpiricismDisbeliefEmpiricismModels

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.