File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이세민

Lee, Semin
Computational Biology Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 12 -
dc.citation.startPage giz125 -
dc.citation.title GIGASCIENCE -
dc.citation.volume 8 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Hui-Su -
dc.contributor.author Jeon, Sungwon -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Changjae -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Yeon Kyung -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Yun Sung -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jungeun -
dc.contributor.author Blazyte, Asta -
dc.contributor.author Manica, Andrea -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Semin -
dc.contributor.author Bhak, Jong -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T18:15:15Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T18:15:15Z -
dc.date.created 2019-12-16 -
dc.date.issued 2019-12 -
dc.description.abstract Background: Long DNA reads produced by single-molecule and pore-based sequencers are more suitable for assembly and structural variation discovery than short-read DNA fragments. For de novo assembly, Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) are the favorite options. However, PacBio's SMRT sequencing is expensive for a full human genome assembly and costs more than $40,000 US for 30× coverage as of 2019. ONT PromethION sequencing, on the other hand, is 1/12 the price of PacBio for the same coverage. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of ONT PromethION and PacBio's SMRT sequencing in relation to the quality.

Findings: We performed whole-genome de novo assemblies and comparison to construct an improved version of KOREF, the Korean reference genome, using sequencing data produced by PromethION and PacBio. With PromethION, an assembly using sequenced reads with 64× coverage (193 Gb, 3 flowcell sequencing) resulted in 3,725 contigs with N50s of 16.7 Mb and a total genome length of 2.8 Gb. It was comparable to a KOREF assembly constructed using PacBio at 62× coverage (188 Gb, 2,695 contigs, and N50s of 17.9 Mb). When we applied Hi-C–derived long-range mapping data, an even higher quality assembly for the 64× coverage was achieved, resulting in 3,179 scaffolds with an N50 of 56.4 Mb.

Conclusion: The pore-based PromethION approach provided a high-quality chromosome-scale human genome assembly at a low cost with long maximum contig and scaffold lengths and was more cost-effective than PacBio at comparable quality measurements.
-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation GIGASCIENCE, v.8, no.12, pp.giz125 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/gigascience/giz125 -
dc.identifier.issn 2047-217X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85076064011 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/30691 -
dc.identifier.url https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/8/12/giz125/5651108 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000506804600001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher BioMed Central -
dc.title Chromosome-scale assembly comparison of the Korean Reference Genome KOREF from PromethION and PacBio with Hi-C mapping information -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.