File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

How to Formulate Scientific Realism and Antirealism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2019-12
DOI
10.1007/s10838-019-09470-w
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/30574
Fulltext
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10838-019-09470-w
Citation
JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, v.50, no.4, pp.477 - 488
Abstract
The wider the gap between rivaling positions, the more there can be debates between rivaling interlocutors. The gap between the respective formulations of scientific realism and antirealism that invoke the Prussian conception of rationality is wider than the gap between the respective formulations of scientific realism and antirealism that invoke the English conception of rationality. Therefore, scientific realists and antirealists should choose the former over the latter as the framework of their debate.
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
ISSN
0925-4560
Keyword (Author)
English conception of rationalityPrussian conception of rationalityScientific antirealismScientific realism

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.