File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Airborne Lidar Sampling Strategies to Enhance Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation from Landsat Imagery

Author(s)
Li, SiqiQuackenbush, Lindi J.Im, Jungho
Issued Date
2019-08
DOI
10.3390/rs11161906
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/27844
Fulltext
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/16/1906
Citation
REMOTE SENSING, v.11, no.16, pp.1906
Abstract
Accurately estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) is important in many applications, including monitoring carbon stocks, investigating deforestation and forest degradation, and designing sustainable forest management strategies. Although lidar provides critical three-dimensional forest structure information for estimating AGB, acquiring comprehensive lidar coverage is often cost prohibitive. This research focused on developing a lidar sampling framework to support AGB estimation from Landsat images. Two sampling strategies, systematic and classification-based, were tested and compared. The proposed strategies were implemented over a temperate forest study site in northern New York State and the processes were then validated at a similar site located in central New York State. Our results demonstrated that while the inclusion of lidar data using systematic or classification-based sampling supports AGB estimation, the systematic sampling selection method was highly dependent on site conditions and had higher accuracy variability. Of the 12 systematic sampling plans, R-2 values ranged from 0.14 to 0.41 and plot root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 84.2 to 93.9 Mg ha(-1). The classification-based sampling outperformed 75% of the systematic sampling strategies at the primary site with R-2 of 0.26 and RMSE of 70.1 Mg ha(-1). The classification-based lidar sampling strategy was relatively easy to apply and was readily transferable to a new study site. Adopting this method at the validation site, the classification-based sampling also worked effectively, with an R-2 of 0.40 and an RMSE of 108.2 Mg ha(-1) compared to the full lidar coverage model with an R-2 of 0.58 and an RMSE of 96.0 Mg ha(-1). This study evaluated different lidar sample selection methods to identify an efficient and effective approach to reduce the volume and cost of lidar acquisitions. The forest type classification-based sampling method described in this study could facilitate cost-effective lidar data collection in future studies.
Publisher
MDPI
ISSN
2072-4292
Keyword (Author)
systematic samplingclassification-based samplingforest typesdata fusionregressionrandom forest
Keyword
MODEL-ASSISTED ESTIMATIONINVENTORY DATATIME-SERIESSTEM VOLUMECLASSIFICATIONINTEGRATIONHEIGHTCOVERAREACOMBINATIONS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.