File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Descriptive and Normative Versions of Scientific Realism and Pessimism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2019-04
DOI
10.31577/filozofia.2019.74.4.2
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/26582
Fulltext
http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/filozofia.2019.74.4.2
Citation
FILOZOFIA, v.74, no.4, pp.278 - 290
Abstract
Descriptive realism holds that T is true, while normative realism holds that T is warranted. Descriptive pessimism holds that T is false, while normative pessimism holds that T is unwarranted. We should distinguish between descriptive and normative realism because some arguments against scientific realism require that scientific realism be interpreted as descriptive realism, and because scientific realists can retreat from descriptive to normative realism when descriptive realism is under attack. We should also distinguish between descriptive and normative pessimism because some arguments against scientific pessimism require that it be interpreted as descriptive pessimism, and because scientific pessimists can retreat from descriptive to normative pessimism when descriptive pessimism is under attack.
Publisher
Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
ISSN
0046-385X
Keyword (Author)
No-Miracles argumentPessimistic inductionScientific realismScientific pessimism

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.