File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Should Scientists Embrace Scientific Realism or Antirealism?

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2019-03
DOI
10.1111/phil.12211
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/26435
Fulltext
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phil.12211
Citation
PHILOSOPHICAL FORUM, v.50, no.1, pp.147 - 158
Abstract
If scientists embrace scientific realism, they can use a scientific theory to explain and predict observables and unobservables. If, however, they embrace scientific antirealism, they cannot use a scientific theory to explain observables and unobservables, and cannot use a scientific theory to predict unobservables. Given that explanation and prediction are means to make scientific progress, scientists can make more scientific progress, if they embrace scientific realism than if they embrace scientific antirealism.
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell
ISSN
0031-806X
Keyword
DEFENSE

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.