File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Estimation of Fugacity of Carbon Dioxide in the East Sea Using In Situ Measurements and Geostationary Ocean Color Imager Satellite Data

Author(s)
Jang, EunnaIm, JunghoPark, Geun-HaPark, Young-Gyu
Issued Date
2017-08
DOI
10.3390/rs9080821
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/22715
Fulltext
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/8/821
Citation
REMOTE SENSING, v.9, no.8, pp.821
Abstract
The ocean is closely related to global warming and on-going climate change by regulating amounts of carbon dioxide through its interaction with the atmosphere. The monitoring of ocean carbon dioxide is important for a better understanding of the role of the ocean as a carbon sink, and regional and global carbon cycles. This study estimated the fugacity of carbon dioxide (fCO(2)) over the East Sea located between Korea and Japan. In situ measurements, satellite data and products from the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) reanalysis data were used through stepwise multi-variate nonlinear regression (MNR) and two machine learning approaches (i.e., support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF)). We used five ocean parameters-colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM; <0.3 m(-1)), chlorophyll-a concentration (Chl-a; <21 mg/m(3)), mixed layer depth (MLD; <160 m), sea surface salinity (SSS; 32-35), and sea surface temperature (SST; 8-28 degrees C)-and four band reflectance (Rrs) data (400 nm-565 nm) and their ratios as input parameters to estimate surface seawater fCO(2) (270-430 mu atm). Results show that RF generally performed better than stepwise MNR and SVR. The root mean square error (RMSE) of validation results by RF was 5.49 mu atm (1.7%), while those of stepwise MNR and SVR were 10.59 mu atm (3.2%) and 6.82 mu atm (2.1%), respectively. Ocean parameters (i.e., sea surface salinity (SSS), sea surface temperature (SST), and mixed layer depth (MLD)) appeared to contribute more than the individual bands or band ratios from the satellite data. Spatial and seasonal distributions of monthly fCO(2) produced from the RF model and sea-air CO2 flux were also examined.
Publisher
MDPI AG
ISSN
2072-4292
Keyword (Author)
fugacity of CO2GOCIHYCOMmachine learningmulti-variate nonlinear regression
Keyword
SURFACE-WATERULLEUNG BASINCO2 FLUXESPARTIAL-PRESSURERANDOM FORESTPCO(2)FCO(2)CLASSIFICATIONALGORITHMSSYSTEM

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.