File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

장재성

Jang, Jaesung
Sensors & Aerosols Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 12372 -
dc.citation.number 22 -
dc.citation.startPage 12365 -
dc.citation.title ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 50 -
dc.contributor.author Hong, Seongkyeol -
dc.contributor.author Bhardwaj, Jyoti -
dc.contributor.author Han, Chang-Ho -
dc.contributor.author Jang, Jaesung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T23:08:14Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T23:08:14Z -
dc.date.created 2016-10-28 -
dc.date.issued 2016-11 -
dc.description.abstract Measurements of airborne viruses via sampling have been critical issues. Most electrostatic samplers have been assessed for bacterial aerosols or micrometer-sized viral particles; however, sampling of submicrometer-sized airborne viruses is necessary, especially because of the high probability of their staying airborne and their deposition in the lower respiratory tract. Here, we present a novel personal electrostatic particle concentrator (EPC) for gentle sampling of submicrometer airborne virus particles. Owing to the enhanced electric field designed in this EPC, the collection efficiencies reached values as high as 99.3-99.8% for 0.05-2 mu m diameter polystyrene particles at a flow rate of 1.2 L/min. Submicrometer-sized MS2 and T3 virus, particles were also collected in the EPC, and the concentrations relative to their respective initial suspensions were more than 10 times higher than those in the SKC BioSampler. Moreover, the recovery rate of T3 was 982 times higher in the EPC (-2 kV) than in the BioSampler at 12.5 L/min because of the gentle sampling of the EPC. Gentle sampling is desirable because many bioaerosols suffer from significant viability losses during sampling. The influence of ozone generated, applied electrostatic field, and the flow rate on the viability of the viruses will also be discussed. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v.50, no.22, pp.12365 - 12372 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1021/acs.est.6b03464 -
dc.identifier.issn 0013-936X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85013023672 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/20722 -
dc.identifier.url http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.est.6b03464 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000388155000035 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher AMER CHEMICAL SOC -
dc.title Gentle Sampling of Submicrometer Airborne Virus Particles using a Personal Electrostatic Particle Concentrator -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus EFFICIENT COLLECTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus AEROSOL COLLECTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INFLUENZA-VIRUS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus VIRAL AEROSOLS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PRECIPITATOR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SIZE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INACTIVATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PERFORMANCE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SAMPLERS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BACTERIA -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.