BROWSE

Related Researcher

Author's Photo

Park, Seungbae
Division of General Studies
Research Interests
  • Philosophy of Science

ITEM VIEW & DOWNLOAD

Explanatory Failures of Relative Realism

Cited 0 times inthomson ciCited 0 times inthomson ci
Title
Explanatory Failures of Relative Realism
Author
Park, Seungbae
Issue Date
2015-08
Publisher
TILGHER-GENOVA S A S
Citation
EPISTEMOLOGIA, v.38, pp.16 - 28
Abstract
Scientific realism (Putnam 1975; Psillos 1999) and relative realism (Mizrahi 2013) claim that successful scientific theories are approximately true and comparatively true, respectively. A theory is approximately true if and only if it is close to the truth. A theory is comparatively true if and only if it is closer to the truth than its competitors are. I argue that relative realism is more skeptical about the claims of science than it initially appears to be and that it can explain neither the success nor the failure of science. Hence, it is not a promising competitor to scientific realism.
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/17662
URL
http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=55046&Tipo=Articolo PDF&lingua=it&idRivista=173
DOI
10.3280/EPIS2015-001002
ISSN
0392-9760
Appears in Collections:
SLA_Journal Papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

find_unist can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Show full item record

qrcode

  • mendeley

    citeulike

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

MENU