File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter

Author(s)
Lee, HongjooAmy, GaryCho, JaeweonYoon, YeominMoon, Seung-HyeonKim, In S
Issued Date
2001-10
DOI
10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00063-X
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11933
Fulltext
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313540100063X
Citation
WATER RESEARCH, v.35, no.14, pp.3301 - 3308
Abstract
One of the most common problems encountered in water treatment applications of membranes is fouling. Natural organic matter (NOM) represents a particularly problematic foulant. Membranes may be fouled by relatively hydrophilic and/or hydrophobic NOM components, depending on NOM characteristics, membrane properties, kind operating conditions. To maximize flux recovery for an NOM-fouled ultrafiltration membrane (NTR 7410), chemical cleaning and hydraulic rinsing with a relatively high cross-flow velocity were investigated as cleaning strategies. The modification of the membrane surface with either an anionic or a cationic surfactant was also evaluated to minimize membrane fouling and to enhance NOM rejection. Foulants from a hydrophobic NOM source (Orange County ground water (OC-GW)) were cleaned more effectively in terms of permeate flux by acid and caustic cleanings than foulants from a relatively hydrophilic NOM source (Horsetooth surface water (HT-SW)). An anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) was not effective as a cleaning agent for foulants from either hydrophobic or hydrophilic NOM sources. High ionic strength cleaning with 0.1 M NaCl was comparatively effective in providing flux recovery for NOM-fouled membranes compared to other chemical cleaning agents, Increased cross-flow velocity and longer cleaning time influenced the efficiency of caustic cleaning, but not high ionic strength cleaning. The membrane was successfully modified only with the cationic surfactant, however, enhanced NOM rejection was accompanied by a significant flux reduction. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
ISSN
0043-1354

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.