File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Biodegradability, DBP formation, and membrane fouling potential of natural organic matter: Characterization and controllability

Author(s)
Kwon, BoksoonLee, SangyoupCho, JaeweonAhn, HyowonLee, DongjooShin, Heung Sup
Issued Date
2005-02
DOI
10.1021/es049919z
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11900
Fulltext
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es049919z
Citation
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v.39, no.3, pp.732 - 739
Abstract
Various natural organic matter (NOM) constituents were evaluated in terms of their biodegradability, disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation potentials,and membrane fouling. The biodegradability of NOM was evaluated with respect to biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) and its inhibition control. NOM was divided into (i) colloidal and noncolloidal NOM, using a dialysis membrane with a molecular weight cutoff of 3500 Da and (ii) hydrophobic, transphilic, and hydrophilic NOM constituents, using XAD-8/4 resins. The colloidal, and noncolloidal hydrophilic, NOM were identified as being more problematic than the other components, exhibiting relatively higher biodegradability and reactivity toward DBP formation potential. A higher biodegradability especially can provide a high risk of membrane biofouling, if a membrane is fouled by highly biodegradable NOM. Colloidal, and noncolloidal hydrophilic, NOM constituents were also shown as major foulants of negatively charged membranes due to their high neutral fractions. Filter adsorber (F/A) types of activated carbons were evaluated in terms of removals of NOM, DBP formation potential, and BDOC and were compared to conventional processes and a nanofiltration membrane. The F/A process exhibited a comparatively good efficiency, especially in DBP and BDOC control, but was not so good at removing NOM. This suggests that F/A could potentially be combined with a membrane process to minimize the DBP formation potential and bio-/organic-fouling (i.e., F/A process as a pretreatment for a membrane process)
Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
ISSN
0013-936X
Keyword
ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANESWATERSYSTEMNF

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.