File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이용재

Lee, Yongjae
Financial Engineering Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 183 -
dc.citation.number 2 -
dc.citation.startPage 150 -
dc.citation.title The Journal of Portfolio Management -
dc.citation.volume 52 -
dc.contributor.author Mehta, Dhagash -
dc.contributor.author Thompson, John R. J. -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hoyoung -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Yongjae -
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-26T19:08:28Z -
dc.date.available 2025-12-26T19:08:28Z -
dc.date.created 2025-12-24 -
dc.date.issued 2025-11 -
dc.description.abstract Clustering and similarity learning are increasingly indispensable for structuring heterogeneous financial data and supporting real-world decision-making. Traditional heuristics such as industry codes, static style boxes, or return correlations offer only coarse and rigid notions of peer groups. Recent advances in metric learning, graph methods, and large language models now make it possible to build adaptive neighborhoods of securities, funds, companies, and investors that align more closely with actual risk, liquidity, and thematic exposures. This tutorial synthesizes these methodological developments and demonstrates their use across major asset classes. Case studies show how supervised proximities improve bond substitution, how fund similarity systems reconcile category reproducibility with outlier detection, how multimodal pipelines refine company comparables for valuation and strategy, and how investor clustering enhances personalization and “know your client” (KYC) analytics. We emphasize modeling choices that make clustering and similarity auditable and robust under regime shifts. We also outline their evaluation protocols such as neighborhood stability, substitution fidelity, and segment utility, and so on, which align with investment, compliance, and fiduciary objectives. Overall, the central message for practitioners is pragmatic: Similarity systems have moved beyond experimental prototypes and now stand as deployable techniques within real investment workflows. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation The Journal of Portfolio Management, v.52, no.2, pp.150 - 183 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.2139/ssrn.5587353 -
dc.identifier.issn 0095-4918 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/89386 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PAGEANT MEDIA LTD -
dc.title Clustering and Similarity Learning in Financial Markets: A Tutorial for the Practitioners -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.