File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 22 -
dc.citation.startPage 5101 -
dc.citation.title MATERIALS -
dc.citation.volume 18 -
dc.contributor.author Gaudel, Gangasagar Sharma -
dc.contributor.author Yu, Seung-Ju -
dc.contributor.author Yang, Hwa-Young -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Ye-Chong -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Sang Hoon -
dc.contributor.author Park, Sang-Ho -
dc.contributor.author Jun, Bong-Hyun -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Young Jun -
dc.contributor.author Rho, Won-Yeop -
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-09T14:24:48Z -
dc.date.available 2025-12-09T14:24:48Z -
dc.date.created 2025-12-09 -
dc.date.issued 2025-11 -
dc.description.abstract Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are known for their excellent low-light performance, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility. The photoanode has a crucial role in enhancing the overall performance of DSSCs and can be modified with different nanostructures. This study explores the impact of photoanode structure on the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of DSSCs, where four configurations of freestanding TiO2 nanotube arrays (f-TNAs), closed-up, closed-down, open-up, and open-down, were employed as photoanodes. Performance was evaluated based on current density (J(sc)), open-circuit voltage (V-oc), fill factor (FF), and PCE concerning dye adsorption, electrolyte diffusion, electron transport, and barrier layer. DSSCs based on open configurations, open-up and open-down f-TNAs, demonstrated superior performance, achieving PCE of 7.73% and 7.71%, respectively. The primary distinction between the DSSCs based on open-up f-TNAs and those based on open-down f-TNAs lies in the dye adsorption time and electron diffusion characteristics. The PCE for DSSCs with closed-down f-TNAs was measured at 6.78%, while DSSCs with closed-up f-TNAs showed a lower PCE of 5.52%. The presence of a barrier layer under the bottom of f-TNAs impacted the PCE for DSSCs with closed-down f-TNAs, whereas for DSSCs with closed-up f-TNAs, insufficient dye loading, poor electrolyte diffusion and barrier layer reduced the performance. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation MATERIALS, v.18, no.22, pp.5101 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/ma18225101 -
dc.identifier.issn 1996-1944 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-105023101134 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/88953 -
dc.identifier.wosid 001625819400001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher MDPI -
dc.title Structural Configuration Effects of Freestanding TiO2 Nanotube Arrays on Power Conversion Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Chemistry, Physical; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering; Physics, Applied; Physics, Condensed Matter -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Chemistry; Materials Science; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering; Physics -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor dye sensitized solar cells -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor anodization -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor freestanding TiO2 nanotube arrays -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor configuration -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GROWTH-MECHANISM -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MORPHOLOGY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SURFACE -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.