File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김남훈

Kim, Namhun
UNIST Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1196 -
dc.citation.number 3-4 -
dc.citation.startPage 1177 -
dc.citation.title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 138 -
dc.contributor.author Anussornnitisarn, Pornthep -
dc.contributor.author Nivasanon, Chanipa -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Namhun -
dc.contributor.author Ransikarbum, Kasin -
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-26T14:30:02Z -
dc.date.available 2025-06-26T14:30:02Z -
dc.date.created 2025-06-24 -
dc.date.issued 2025-05 -
dc.description.abstract The selection of technologies in additive manufacturing (AM) is pivotal for advancing production systems that are economically viable, environmentally responsible, and socially beneficial. This study proposes an integrated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to address the technology selection problem, comparing the baseline technology of injection molding with fused deposition modeling (FDM)-based AM technologies. The framework employs the best-worst method (BWM) to determine the weights of sustainability criteria, followed by the application of the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (FTOPSIS) to rank alternatives. A case study on healthcare components is used to demonstrate the approach. The results highlight distinct decision-making priorities among stakeholder groups: economic considerations are most important to AM experts, the AM education group prioritizes environmental factors, and healthcare professionals deem social factors the most significant. Furthermore, the rankings for different healthcare products vary across these groups, illustrating the influence of weighted criteria on technology preferences. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness and reliability of the findings. This study provides a valuable framework for addressing tactical-level decisions related to AM technology selection and offers insights that can serve as foundational input for optimizing AM networks involving diverse technologies. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, v.138, no.3-4, pp.1177 - 1196 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00170-025-15572-1 -
dc.identifier.issn 0268-3768 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-105003753268 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/87222 -
dc.identifier.wosid 001511001700003 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher SPRINGER LONDON LTD -
dc.title Sustainable technology selection in additive manufacturing: an integrated fuzzy decision analysis framework -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Automation & Control Systems;Engineering, Manufacturing -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Automation & Control Systems;Engineering -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Additive manufacturing -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Technology selection -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.