File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
SFX Link
- Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
- Park, Seungbae
- Philosophy of Science Lab.
Views & Downloads
Detailed Information
Cited time in 
Cited time in 
Cited time in
Metadata Downloads
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.citation.conferencePlace | LI | - |
| dc.citation.conferencePlace | zoom | - |
| dc.citation.title | VISUALITY 2025: SOCIAL INNOVATIONS FOR SUSTAINABILITY COMMUNICATION | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Seungbae | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-09T11:30:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-09T11:30:05Z | - |
| dc.date.created | 2025-05-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-08 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Rawls's theory of justice holds that an action is morally right because it would be accepted by contractors behind the veil of ignorance. Rawls's theory of justice, thus defined, puts the cart before the horse. Both moral realists and emotivists would endorse this objection to Rawls's theory of justice. Rawls's theory of justice does not provide useful criteria for classifying controversial actions, such as same-sex marriage and affirmative action, as morally right and wrong. However, it does provide a useful rule to encourage moral agents to behave morally. | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | VISUALITY 2025: SOCIAL INNOVATIONS FOR SUSTAINABILITY COMMUNICATION | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/87039 | - |
| dc.identifier.url | https://vilniustech.lt/international-conference-visuality/program/343929 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.publisher | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Faculty of Creative Industries | - |
| dc.title | Critiques of Rawls's Theory of Justice | - |
| dc.type | Conference Paper | - |
| dc.date.conferenceDate | 2025-05-08 | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.