File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Rawls's theory of justice and affirmative action in science

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2024-08
DOI
10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.3.15
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/83579
Fulltext
https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/5430
Citation
FILOSOFIJA. SOCIOLOGIJA, v.35, no.3, pp.378 - 386
Abstract
Rival applied ethicists have constructed arguments for and against affirmative action independently of Rawls’s theory of justice. Those arguments do not resolve the dispute about affirmative action. I reformulate them with the use of Rawls’s theory of justice and conclude that the reformulated arguments do not resolve the dispute about affirmative action either. Therefore, Rawls’s theory of justice is not useful in resolving the dispute about affirmative action. This point applies to affirmative action in science, contrary to what some writers suggest.
Publisher
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers
ISSN
0235-7186
Keyword (Author)
Ockham’s Razormoral objectivismmoral propertiesmoral subjectivism

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.