File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 142468 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION -
dc.citation.volume 458 -
dc.contributor.author Syauqi, Ahmad -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyunjun -
dc.contributor.author Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-01T11:05:08Z -
dc.date.available 2024-08-01T11:05:08Z -
dc.date.created 2024-07-03 -
dc.date.issued 2024-06 -
dc.description.abstract This study conducts technical, economic, and safety analysis of a green hydrogen production system consisting of a 1000 kWp photovoltaic cell, 3 options of energy storage namely lead carbon (PbC), lithium -ion (Li -ion), and repurposed lithium -ion (2nd Life Li -ion) battery, and an electrolyzer. Firstly, the system is optimized to maximum hydrogen production by adjusting equipment capacity and capacity factors, informed by a 1-h resolution solar energy generation profile. This optimization yields insights into the system's yearly operational dynamics. Techno-economic analysis was conducted to estimate the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from 2020 to 2050, additionally, uncertainty analysis using Monte -Carlo simulation to estimate the range of uncertainty in LCOH projection from 2020 to 2050 was performed. Furthermore, a quantitative risk analysis, utilizing the process route index metric, evaluates the risk of battery explosions. Finally, this study employs multi -criteria decision-making to choose the best energy storage technology to produce green hydrogen from economic and safety factors. The result indicates that in 2020, the PbC battery emerged as the most cost-effective option. However, over time, both lithium batteries became the cheapest option with almost similar trends. In terms of explosion hazard, the analysis shows that the PbC battery is a safer option for stationary energy storage. When both aspects are considered, the preferred battery option is almost certainly PbC over the years, but in extreme cases where the decision-maker places significant emphasis on economic factors both Li -ion options may become preferable. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, v.458, pp.142468 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142468 -
dc.identifier.issn 0959-6526 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85192823988 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/83347 -
dc.identifier.wosid 001242122200001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title Optimal energy storage system selection for future cost-effective green hydrogen production: Integrating techno-economic, risk-based decision making, and cost projections -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Green hydrogen -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Energy storage -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Techno-economic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Cost projections -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Risk analysis -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ALKALINE WATER ELECTROLYSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BATTERY -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.