File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

원종묵

Won, Jongmuk
Sustainable Smart Geotechnical Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1404 -
dc.citation.number 11 -
dc.citation.startPage 1397 -
dc.citation.title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH -
dc.citation.volume 37 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, C. -
dc.contributor.author Park, M. -
dc.contributor.author Park, S. -
dc.contributor.author Won, J. -
dc.contributor.author Choi, H. -
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-12T10:35:17Z -
dc.date.available 2024-07-12T10:35:17Z -
dc.date.created 2024-07-11 -
dc.date.issued 2013-09 -
dc.description.abstract In this study, a series of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical analyses was performed in order to evaluate the performance of six full-scale closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers constructed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea. The high-density polyethylene pipe, borehole grouting and surrounding ground formation were modeled using FLUENT, a finite-volume method program, for analyzing the heat transfer process of the system. Two user-defined functions accounting for the difference in the temperatures of the circulating inflow and outflow fluid and the variation of the surrounding ground temperature with depth were adopted in the FLUENT model. The relevant thermal properties of materials measured in laboratory were used in the numerical analyses to compare the thermal efficiency of various types of the heat exchangers installed in the test bed. The numerical simulations provide verification for the in-situ thermal response test (TRT) results. The numerical analysis with the ground thermal conductivity of 4.0 W/mK yielded by the back-analysis was in better agreement with the in-situ TRT result than with the ground thermal conductivity of 3.0 W/mK. From the results of CFD back-analyses, the effective thermal conductivities estimated from both the in-situ TRT and numerical analysis are smaller than the ground thermal conductivity (=4.0 W/m.K) that is input in the numerical model because of the intrinsic limitation of the line source model that simplifies a borehole assemblage as an infinitely long line source in the homogeneous material. However, the discrepancy between the ground thermal conductivity and the effective thermal conductivity from the in-situ TRT decreases when borehole resistance decreases with a new three pipe-type heat exchanger leads to less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes than the conventional U-loop type heat exchanger. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, v.37, no.11, pp.1397 - 1404 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/er.2929 -
dc.identifier.issn 0363-907X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84880333726 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/83101 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000321759100014 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher WILEY -
dc.title Back-analyses of in-situ thermal response test (TRT) for evaluating ground thermal conductivity -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Energy & Fuels; Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Energy & Fuels; Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor closed-loop vertical ground heat exchanger -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor thermal response test -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor back-analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor computational fluid dynamics -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor effective thermal conductivity -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SIMULATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MODEL -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.