File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 100427 -
dc.citation.title International Journal of Thermofluids -
dc.citation.volume 20 -
dc.contributor.author Niaki, Seyed Omid Daei -
dc.contributor.author Pourfallah, Mohsen -
dc.contributor.author Ghadi, Arian Zare -
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-15T17:35:12Z -
dc.date.available 2024-02-15T17:35:12Z -
dc.date.created 2024-02-15 -
dc.date.issued 2023-11 -
dc.description.abstract Geoexchange is one of the most energy-efficient, environmentally clean, and cost-effective space-conditioning systems available on the market. Seasonal storage of solar energy in geothermal boreholes is sharply interesting as a means of heating and cooling in buildings with different applications. In this study, a closed-loop geo-exchange and solar thermal system with two different heat exchangers are examined in an energy-efficient house. TRNSYS, a simulation software tool, was used to model the yearly performance of the hybrid ground-source heat pump (GSHP) system. Two different types of ground heat exchangers, e.g., tube-in-tube and U-tube were employed. The mass flow rate through the heat exchangers and the solar collector was examined to choose the best scenario for each of them. The economic benefits of a gray water heat recovery system and solar collector were studied; the results show that 517 and 536 US Dollars/Year can be saved from each of them, respectively. System performance analysis was carried out in different cities with various climates in Iran. Moreover, a complete economic assessment was evaluated for all cases. The results show that for the same inlet water temperature to GSHP, the tube-in-tube heat exchanger can pass 45% more flow than the U-tube heat exchanger for the same size as the HP. Furthermore, in the absence of the solar collector, a 2.7 × 108 kJ increase was conducted in the auxiliary heater component yearly. Finally, four different climates were evaluated for the launching of the GSHP system with a solar thermal collector. The hot and dry climate with 27 °C fluid inlet to a heat pump, a total borehole depth of 220 m, and an initial cost of $ 25,047 was selected as the most appropriate weather conditions for launching the system in Iran. © 2023 The Author(s) -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation International Journal of Thermofluids, v.20, pp.100427 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100427 -
dc.identifier.issn 2666-2027 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85165542106 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/81401 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Elsevier -
dc.title Feasibility and investigation of residential HVAC system with combined ground source heat pump and solar thermal collectors in different climates of Iran -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Geothermal energy -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor GSHP -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor GWHR -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor HVAC -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Solar collector -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor TRNSYS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.