File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 5 -
dc.citation.startPage 110830 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING -
dc.citation.volume 11 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Heehyang -
dc.contributor.author Gu, Jiwon -
dc.contributor.author Byun, Manhee -
dc.contributor.author Choe, Changgwon -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-29T17:05:11Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-29T17:05:11Z -
dc.date.created 2023-11-21 -
dc.date.issued 2023-10 -
dc.description.abstract As environmental pollution worsens, many strategies are emerging to reduce CO2 in various chemical processes. The practical strategy of byproduct hydrogen utilization in propane dehydrogenation is also being reviewed a lot. In this work, a comprehensive analysis was conducted for propane dehydrogenation process design integrated with membrane reactor and solid oxide fuel cell. Especially, membrane reactor and sequential reactor were used to increase the yield of the process. All assessments were investigated based on Aspen Plus (R), which is com-mercial software for process simulation. Levelized cost of electricity was derived through itemized cost esti-mation. The 2.81 $ kWh-1 of levelized cost of electricity was revealed through itemized cost estimation; it is higher than industrial electricity in general. Therefore, various scenarios were conducted to reduce the levelized cost of electricity compared to industrial electricity price on sale, currently. The optimistic case (1.20 $ kWh-1) can be priced close to industrial electricity price through 100 % of propane recycling rate and -20 % of reduction in the price of the influential factors. For life cycle assessment, the environmental impact of global warming potential was assessed as 4.93 kg CO2 eq MJ-1 of CO2 emissions. Various scenarios had been proposed to reduce CO2 as with the economic assessment. Under pessimistic, realistic, and optimistic conditions, the results of global warming potential were 5.61, 4.93, and 4.25 kg CO2 eq MJ-1, respectively. The comprehensive analysis will be presented as guidelines for the actual use of byproduct hydrogen. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, v.11, no.5, pp.110830 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110830 -
dc.identifier.issn 2213-3437 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85168802155 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/67384 -
dc.identifier.wosid 001093007600001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title Novel propane dehydrogenation process design integrated with membrane reactor and solid oxide fuel cell: Economic and environmental aspects -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Chemical -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Propane dehydrogenation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Membrane reactor -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Solid oxide fuel cell -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Techno-economic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Life cycle assessment -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Carbon neutrality -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PROPYLENE PRODUCTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus H-2 PRODUCTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TECHNOLOGIES -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.