File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 1 -
dc.citation.startPage 2206512 -
dc.citation.title GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK -
dc.citation.volume 14 -
dc.contributor.author Janizadeh, Saeid -
dc.contributor.author Bateni, Sayed M. -
dc.contributor.author Jun, Changhyun -
dc.contributor.author Im, Jungho -
dc.contributor.author Pai, Hao-Thing -
dc.contributor.author Band, Shahab S. -
dc.contributor.author Mosavi, Amir -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T11:40:57Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T11:40:57Z -
dc.date.created 2023-06-07 -
dc.date.issued 2023-12 -
dc.description.abstract In this study, the generalized linear model (GLM) and four ensemble methods (partial least squares (PLS), boosting, bagging, and Bayesian) were applied to predict forest fire hazard in the Chalus Rood watershed in the Mazandaran Province, Iran. Data from 108 historical forest fire events collected through field surveys were applied as the basis of the analysis. About 70% of the data were used for training the models, while the remaining 30% was used for testing. A total of 14 environmental, climatic, and vegetation variables were used as input features to the models to predict forest fire probability. After conducting a multicollinearity test on the independent variables, the GLM and the ensemble models were applied for modeling. The efficiency of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve parameters. Results from the validation process, based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC), showed that the GLM, PLS-GLM, boosted-GLM, Bagging-GLM, and Bayesian-GLM models had efficiencies of 0.79, 0.75, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The results indicated that all ensemble methods, except the PLS algorithm, improved the performance of the GLM model in modeling forest fire hazards in the Chalus Rood watershed, with the Bayesian algorithm being the most efficient method among them. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, v.14, no.1, pp.2206512 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/19475705.2023.2206512 -
dc.identifier.issn 1947-5705 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85159097676 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/64402 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000985029200001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD -
dc.title Combination four different ensemble algorithms with the generalized linear model (GLM) for predicting forest fire susceptibility -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Geosciences, Multidisciplinary;Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;Water Resources -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Geology;Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;Water Resources -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CELLULAR-AUTOMATON -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MIXED MODELS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TIME-SERIES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CLASSIFICATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RISK -
dc.subject.keywordPlus OPTIMIZATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SYSTEM -
dc.subject.keywordPlus NDV -
dc.subject.keywordPlus IIRAN -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.