File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in CoronaryIn-Stent Restenosis

Author(s)
Jun, Eun JungShin, Eun-SeokYuan, Song LinBhak, YoungjuneGarg, ScotKang, Woong CholKim, Je SangKim, June-HongBae, Jang-WhanRha, Seung-WoonChae, In-Ho
Issued Date
2022-04
DOI
10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.015
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/62211
Citation
JACC: Asia, v.2, no.2, pp.170 - 179
Abstract
Background: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The Genoss DCB is a novel paclitaxel-coated balloon with a shellac plus vitamin E excipient that enhances drug delivery to the target lesion, minimizing restenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the angiographic efficacy, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB in a randomized controlled trial designed to enable regulatory approval of this new device in South Korea. Methods: This noninferiority trial randomized patients experiencing their first ISR to the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB or the reference SeQuent Please iopromide-based DCB in a 1:1 ratio. All patients underwent planned angiographic and clinical follow-up at 6 months. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 6 months in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). Results: A total of 82 patients from 7 centers were randomized to either the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB group (n = 41) or the reference iopromide-based DCB group (n = 41). The 6-month in-segment LLL was 0.15 ± 0.43 mm with the novel DCB compared with 0.24 ± 0.39 mm with the reference device. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.13 mm, lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.29 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). Major cardiovascular events were comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (7.7% for the novel DCB vs 10.3% for the reference DCB; P = 0.692). Conclusions: In this multicenter, head-to-head comparison randomized trial, the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB showed a comparable result to the reference iopromide-based device for the primary endpoint of 6-month in-segment LLL for the treatment of coronary ISR. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please in Korean Patient With Coronary In-stent Restenosis; NCT04405063)
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
2772-3747

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.