File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 137420 -
dc.citation.title CHEMOSPHERE -
dc.citation.volume 313 -
dc.contributor.author Naquash, Ahmad -
dc.contributor.author Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul -
dc.contributor.author Chaniago, Yus Donald -
dc.contributor.author Riaz, Amjad -
dc.contributor.author Yehia, Fatma -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Moonyong -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T13:07:20Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T13:07:20Z -
dc.date.created 2023-02-15 -
dc.date.issued 2023-02 -
dc.description.abstract Hydrogen (H2) separation and purification is challenging because of the high purity and recovery requirements in particular applications, as well as the critical properties of H2 and its associated components. Unlike pressure swing adsorption, cryogenic- and membrane-based technologies are currently employed for H2 separation. Membraneassisted (case-I) and cryogenic-assisted (case-II) separation and purification of H2 were evaluated in this study in terms of the energy, exergy, and economic aspects of the processes. In case-I and case-II, H2 was first produced from synthesis gas via the water-gas shift reaction and was then separated from other components using membrane and cryogenic systems, respectively. Additionally, an organic Rankine cycle was integrated with the water-gas shift reactors to recover the waste heat. A well-known commercial process simulation software, Aspen Hysys (R) v11, was employed to simulate both processes. Energy analysis revealed that case-I has a lower energy consumption (0.50 kWh/ kg) than case-II (2.01 kWh/kg). However, low H2 purity and recovery rates are the main limitations of case-I. In terms of exergy, the H2 separation section in case-I exhibited a higher efficiency (28.4%) than case-II (14.7%). Furthermore, the economic evaluation showed that case-I was more expensive ($17.7 M) than case-II ($10.2 M) because of the high cost of the compressors required. In conclusion, this study could assist industry practitioners and academic researchers in selecting optimal H2 separation and purification technologies for improving the overall H2 economy. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation CHEMOSPHERE, v.313, pp.137420 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137420 -
dc.identifier.issn 0045-6535 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85144034946 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/61990 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000904124400005 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD -
dc.title Separation and purification of syngas-derived hydrogen: A comparative evaluation of membrane- and cryogenic-assisted approaches -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Environmental Sciences -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Environmental Sciences & Ecology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Synthesis gas -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Cryogenic separation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Membrane separation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Hydrogen purification -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Water -gas shift reaction -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COAL -
dc.subject.keywordPlus OPTIMIZATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CARBON -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LIQUEFACTION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.