File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

TlustyTsvi

Tlusty, Tsvi
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 11 -
dc.citation.startPage msac217 -
dc.citation.title MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION -
dc.citation.volume 39 -
dc.contributor.author McBride, John M. -
dc.contributor.author Eckmann, Jean-Pierre -
dc.contributor.author Tlusty, Tsvi -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T13:20:15Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T13:20:15Z -
dc.date.created 2022-11-29 -
dc.date.issued 2022-11 -
dc.description.abstract Proteins need to selectively interact with specific targets among a multitude of similar molecules in the cell. However, despite a firm physical understanding of binding interactions, we lack a general theory of how proteins evolve high specificity. Here, we present such a model that combines chemistry, mechanics, and genetics and explains how their interplay governs the evolution of specific protein-ligand interactions. The model shows that there are many routes to achieving molecular discrimination-by varying degrees of flexibility and shape/chemistry complementarity-but the key ingredient is precision. Harder discrimination tasks require more collective and precise coaction of structure, forces, and movements. Proteins can achieve this through correlated mutations extending far from a binding site, which fine-tune the localized interaction with the ligand. Thus, the solution of more complicated tasks is enabled by increasing the protein size, and proteins become more evolvable and robust when they are larger than the bare minimum required for discrimination. The model makes testable, specific predictions about the role of flexibility and shape mismatch in discrimination, and how evolution can independently tune affinity and specificity. Thus, the proposed theory of specific binding addresses the natural question of "why are proteins so big?". A possible answer is that molecular discrimination is often a hard task best performed by adding more layers to the protein. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, v.39, no.11, pp.msac217 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/molbev/msac217 -
dc.identifier.issn 0737-4038 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85141892429 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/60703 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000879850000001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher OXFORD UNIV PRESS -
dc.title General Theory of Specific Binding: Insights from a Genetic-Mechano-Chemical Protein Model -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics & Heredity -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics & Heredity -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor molecular recognition -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor binding specificity -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor conformational changes -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor protein evolution -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor tRNA synthetase -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ENTHALPY-ENTROPY COMPENSATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ELASTIC NETWORK MODELS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LIGAND-BINDING -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CONFORMATIONAL ENTROPY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SHAPE COMPLEMENTARITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RECOGNITION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus AFFINITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PREDICTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus EVOLUTION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.